https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249204 Interim protection was granted against recovery of the balance service tax, interest and penalties because the dispute on port services and CENVAT credit required detailed adjudication. The appellant relied on decisions suggesting that port-related charges such as royalty, rent and allied recoveries did not fall within port services for the relevant period, while both sides cited authorities on admissibility of input service credit. As the nature of the controversy and the deposits already made were considered sufficient, coercive recovery of the remaining dues was stayed until disposal of the appeal. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jul 2014 20:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249204 Interim protection was granted against recovery of the balance service tax, interest and penalties because the dispute on port services and CENVAT credit required detailed adjudication. The appellant relied on decisions suggesting that port-related charges such as royalty, rent and allied recoveries did not fall within port services for the relevant period, while both sides cited authorities on admissibility of input service credit. As the nature of the controversy and the deposits already made were considered sufficient, coercive recovery of the remaining dues was stayed until disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249204