<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 240 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249203</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision confirming a service tax demand on Erection, Commissioning, and Installation services provided to the Governments of M.P. and Chhattisgarh. The Tribunal held that the services should be classified as separate supply items and services, not indivisible works contracts, leading to a different approach in calculating service tax. The matter was remanded for de-novo adjudication by the Original Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing the importance of proper assessment based on contract details and invoices. The appeal and stay application were disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 20:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 240 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249203</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision confirming a service tax demand on Erection, Commissioning, and Installation services provided to the Governments of M.P. and Chhattisgarh. The Tribunal held that the services should be classified as separate supply items and services, not indivisible works contracts, leading to a different approach in calculating service tax. The matter was remanded for de-novo adjudication by the Original Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing the importance of proper assessment based on contract details and invoices. The appeal and stay application were disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>