<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 239 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order dismissing the appeal for non-compliance due to the appellant having discharged the service tax liability on mobilization advance, albeit with timing discrepancies. The matter was remanded for the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide on the appeal&#039;s merits without requiring pre-deposit, thereby resolving the stay application and appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 19:59:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 239 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order dismissing the appeal for non-compliance due to the appellant having discharged the service tax liability on mobilization advance, albeit with timing discrepancies. The matter was remanded for the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide on the appeal&#039;s merits without requiring pre-deposit, thereby resolving the stay application and appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>