<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 223 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249186</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully challenged the dismissal of their appeals regarding depreciation on securities held for maturity for the assessment years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, which denied depreciation claims based on RBI guidelines, was overturned. The Division Bench emphasized the importance of respecting the taxpayer&#039;s consistent accounting method, ultimately validating the appellant&#039;s approach in line with the Income Tax Act and Supreme Court approval. The dispute also addressed the valuation of securities, with the Tribunal rejecting the appellant&#039;s method but the Division Bench supporting their historical practice for claiming depreciation based on market values.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 223 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249186</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully challenged the dismissal of their appeals regarding depreciation on securities held for maturity for the assessment years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, which denied depreciation claims based on RBI guidelines, was overturned. The Division Bench emphasized the importance of respecting the taxpayer&#039;s consistent accounting method, ultimately validating the appellant&#039;s approach in line with the Income Tax Act and Supreme Court approval. The dispute also addressed the valuation of securities, with the Tribunal rejecting the appellant&#039;s method but the Division Bench supporting their historical practice for claiming depreciation based on market values.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>