<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 206 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249169</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal, challenging the assessment of understated income by the assessee in relation to certificate of deposits, was dismissed. The appellate tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s explanations and found no suppression or understatement of income. The detailed tabular charts provided by the assessee supported their position, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The order was pronounced on June 13, 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 206 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249169</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal, challenging the assessment of understated income by the assessee in relation to certificate of deposits, was dismissed. The appellate tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s explanations and found no suppression or understatement of income. The detailed tabular charts provided by the assessee supported their position, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The order was pronounced on June 13, 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>