<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 204 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249167</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment under Section 147 for AY 2007-08 was invalid as the property sold was a residential house, not agricultural land as assumed by the Assessing Officer. The AO&#039;s reasons for reopening were based on incorrect grounds, leading to the quashing of the assessment order. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, rendering other grounds raised against the reassessment additions moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:37:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 204 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249167</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment under Section 147 for AY 2007-08 was invalid as the property sold was a residential house, not agricultural land as assumed by the Assessing Officer. The AO&#039;s reasons for reopening were based on incorrect grounds, leading to the quashing of the assessment order. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, rendering other grounds raised against the reassessment additions moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>