<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 184 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in the case concerning the confiscation of goods under Section 113(k) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant, a merchant exporter, successfully argued that there was no intention to export substandard goods and that necessary precautions were taken before exportation. The Tribunal found that the goods were not liable for confiscation as the appellant did not violate Section 113(k). Consequently, no redemption fine or penalty was imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 184 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in the case concerning the confiscation of goods under Section 113(k) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant, a merchant exporter, successfully argued that there was no intention to export substandard goods and that necessary precautions were taken before exportation. The Tribunal found that the goods were not liable for confiscation as the appellant did not violate Section 113(k). Consequently, no redemption fine or penalty was imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>