<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 176 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249139</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to pursue necessary stay orders from the appellate authority regarding the demand notice for outstanding arrears for Assessment Year 2006-07 and 2007-08. The respondents were prohibited from taking coercive action during the pendency of the stay petition, and the court instructed the second respondent to decide on the stay petition within four weeks. No costs were imposed, and all related petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 20:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 176 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249139</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to pursue necessary stay orders from the appellate authority regarding the demand notice for outstanding arrears for Assessment Year 2006-07 and 2007-08. The respondents were prohibited from taking coercive action during the pendency of the stay petition, and the court instructed the second respondent to decide on the stay petition within four weeks. No costs were imposed, and all related petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>