<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 170 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249133</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the treatment of transactions as business income and the premature invocation of penalty provisions. The judgment emphasized the distinction between capital gains and business income based on the nature of the transactions and the intention behind them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 20:32:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 170 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249133</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant regarding the treatment of transactions as business income and the premature invocation of penalty provisions. The judgment emphasized the distinction between capital gains and business income based on the nature of the transactions and the intention behind them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>