<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1235 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165426</link>
    <description>Central sales tax under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies only where goods move from one State to another within the territory of India. The court noted that Article 297 and the Maritime Zones Act, 1976 confer only limited sovereign rights over the exclusive economic zone and do not, without a valid notification, make that zone part of India&#039;s territory for this purpose. As no notification extended the Act to the exclusive economic zone, the movement of goods from Hazira to Bombay High was not treated as inter-State movement under section 3. The tax demand was therefore held to lack jurisdiction and the assessment was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1235 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165426</link>
      <description>Central sales tax under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies only where goods move from one State to another within the territory of India. The court noted that Article 297 and the Maritime Zones Act, 1976 confer only limited sovereign rights over the exclusive economic zone and do not, without a valid notification, make that zone part of India&#039;s territory for this purpose. As no notification extended the Act to the exclusive economic zone, the movement of goods from Hazira to Bombay High was not treated as inter-State movement under section 3. The tax demand was therefore held to lack jurisdiction and the assessment was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>