https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249123 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the Commissioner's order confirming service tax liability under 'Convention' service instead of 'Mandap Keeper' service. The Tribunal found the appellant's services did not align with the definition of 'convention' as per the Act, emphasizing that service tax should not be charged twice for the same service. The lack of specific allegations or conclusions in the show cause notice rendered the adjudication order unsustainable, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant without costs imposed. en-us Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249123 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the Commissioner's order confirming service tax liability under 'Convention' service instead of 'Mandap Keeper' service. The Tribunal found the appellant's services did not align with the definition of 'convention' as per the Act, emphasizing that service tax should not be charged twice for the same service. The lack of specific allegations or conclusions in the show cause notice rendered the adjudication order unsustainable, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant without costs imposed. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 30 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249123