https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249122 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they did not provide Business Auxiliary Services as alleged by the Revenue. The transactions were sales on a principal-to-principal basis, and no commission was received. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of service provision and set aside the service tax demands, allowing the appeals. en-us Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249122 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they did not provide Business Auxiliary Services as alleged by the Revenue. The transactions were sales on a principal-to-principal basis, and no commission was received. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of service provision and set aside the service tax demands, allowing the appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249122