<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 157 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249120</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI granted the applicants&#039; request for a waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal considered the issue of maintaining separate records for input services and the applicability of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. Relying on a previous case precedent, where a similar demand was set aside due to the reversal of credit on common input services, the Tribunal found merit in the applicants&#039; case. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues, stayed the recovery process during the appeal, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 157 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249120</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI granted the applicants&#039; request for a waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal considered the issue of maintaining separate records for input services and the applicability of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. Relying on a previous case precedent, where a similar demand was set aside due to the reversal of credit on common input services, the Tribunal found merit in the applicants&#039; case. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of dues, stayed the recovery process during the appeal, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>