<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 152 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249115</link>
    <description>The court denied the condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing gross negligence and inaction by the applicant as reasons for dismissal. The judge found that the delay was not due to misplacement but rather the applicant&#039;s lack of initiative following the Senior Manager&#039;s resignation. Consequently, the court dismissed the condonation of delay application and the appeal along with the stay application, based on the timeline of events and lack of justification for the delay provided by the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:59:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 152 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249115</link>
      <description>The court denied the condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing gross negligence and inaction by the applicant as reasons for dismissal. The judge found that the delay was not due to misplacement but rather the applicant&#039;s lack of initiative following the Senior Manager&#039;s resignation. Consequently, the court dismissed the condonation of delay application and the appeal along with the stay application, based on the timeline of events and lack of justification for the delay provided by the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>