<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 147 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249110</link>
    <description>Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. was held applicable to goods manufactured in a 100% export oriented undertaking because the notification expressly extended the exemption to such units. The proviso to Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was considered, but it did not exclude the benefit where the notification itself specifically covered export oriented undertakings. Denial of the exemption was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 147 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249110</link>
      <description>Notification No. 23/2003-C.E. was held applicable to goods manufactured in a 100% export oriented undertaking because the notification expressly extended the exemption to such units. The proviso to Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was considered, but it did not exclude the benefit where the notification itself specifically covered export oriented undertakings. Denial of the exemption was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>