<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 146 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for refund, rejecting the unjust enrichment argument and emphasizing compliance with Section 11A of the Central Excise Act before recovering erroneous refunds. The judgment underscored the significance of accurate duty assessment and adherence to statutory provisions in excise cases, clarifying legal principles governing such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 146 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for refund, rejecting the unjust enrichment argument and emphasizing compliance with Section 11A of the Central Excise Act before recovering erroneous refunds. The judgment underscored the significance of accurate duty assessment and adherence to statutory provisions in excise cases, clarifying legal principles governing such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>