<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 989 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165384</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitions in part, directing the deferment of recovery of differential tax amounts until the pending representation before the Government was resolved. Emphasizing consistency in the government&#039;s approach, the court found in favor of the petitioner due to the similarity between the current case and a previous case where a favorable decision was given. The court highlighted the importance of uniformity in government actions in similar cases and provided relief to the petitioner regarding the recovery of differential tax amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 989 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165384</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitions in part, directing the deferment of recovery of differential tax amounts until the pending representation before the Government was resolved. Emphasizing consistency in the government&#039;s approach, the court found in favor of the petitioner due to the similarity between the current case and a previous case where a favorable decision was given. The court highlighted the importance of uniformity in government actions in similar cases and provided relief to the petitioner regarding the recovery of differential tax amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>