https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249084 The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority's decision, requiring the appellant to pre-deposit 50% of the disallowed credit and confirming the legal provisions and jurisdictional authority for recovery. The extended period for demand was justified, and the retrospective application of the formula for quantifying ineligible credit was deemed inappropriate. en-us Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 11:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249084 The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority's decision, requiring the appellant to pre-deposit 50% of the disallowed credit and confirming the legal provisions and jurisdictional authority for recovery. The extended period for demand was justified, and the retrospective application of the formula for quantifying ineligible credit was deemed inappropriate. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249084