https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249082 The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal due to the substantial delay of 604 days and the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for non-receipt of the impugned order. The acknowledgment card showing delivery at the appellant's address contradicted their claim, leading to the dismissal of the stay petition and appeal. The judgment highlights the importance of timely filing and the necessity for parties to substantiate their claims thoroughly in legal proceedings, underscoring the strict approach towards condonation of delay. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jul 2014 15:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249082 The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal due to the substantial delay of 604 days and the appellant's failure to provide a sufficient explanation for non-receipt of the impugned order. The acknowledgment card showing delivery at the appellant's address contradicted their claim, leading to the dismissal of the stay petition and appeal. The judgment highlights the importance of timely filing and the necessity for parties to substantiate their claims thoroughly in legal proceedings, underscoring the strict approach towards condonation of delay. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249082