<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 117 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249080</link>
    <description>Reversal of the entire common input service credit with interest was treated as sufficient compliance where taxable and exempted services were provided without separate records. On that basis, the Tribunal applied its earlier view that such reversal is equivalent to non-availment of credit, so the percentage payment prescribed under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules was not attracted. A strong prima facie case was therefore shown for interim relief, and the appellant obtained waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 117 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249080</link>
      <description>Reversal of the entire common input service credit with interest was treated as sufficient compliance where taxable and exempted services were provided without separate records. On that basis, the Tribunal applied its earlier view that such reversal is equivalent to non-availment of credit, so the percentage payment prescribed under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules was not attracted. A strong prima facie case was therefore shown for interim relief, and the appellant obtained waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>