<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 116 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the demand under the Manpower Recruitment Service category unsustainable as the remuneration was for lump sum work, not labor supplied. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 116 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the demand under the Manpower Recruitment Service category unsustainable as the remuneration was for lump sum work, not labor supplied. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>