https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249070 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to allow the CENVAT Credit for the respondents. Since the matter was settled before the Settlement Commission and no adjudication confirmed the suppression of facts, the respondents were entitled to take the CENVAT Credit. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed due to the lack of conclusive evidence of suppression of facts, supporting the respondents' entitlement to the credit. en-us Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249070 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to allow the CENVAT Credit for the respondents. Since the matter was settled before the Settlement Commission and no adjudication confirmed the suppression of facts, the respondents were entitled to take the CENVAT Credit. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed due to the lack of conclusive evidence of suppression of facts, supporting the respondents' entitlement to the credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249070