<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 105 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, ruling that debiting the Cenvat Credit Account for pre-deposit was valid despite the previous judgment cited. The appellant&#039;s compliance with the pre-deposit direction through this method was deemed sufficient, leading to the remand of the case for a decision on merits. The stay application and appeal were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 14:40:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 105 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, ruling that debiting the Cenvat Credit Account for pre-deposit was valid despite the previous judgment cited. The appellant&#039;s compliance with the pre-deposit direction through this method was deemed sufficient, leading to the remand of the case for a decision on merits. The stay application and appeal were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>