<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 90 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249053</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) regarding the eligibility of income for deduction under Section 80IB (10) for a housing project on a plot of land less than one acre. It clarified the interpretation of &#039;built up area&#039; for the relevant period, excluding the balcony area from the calculation. As the total built-up area fell below the required threshold after excluding the balcony area, the assessee was deemed entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB (10). The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 90 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249053</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) regarding the eligibility of income for deduction under Section 80IB (10) for a housing project on a plot of land less than one acre. It clarified the interpretation of &#039;built up area&#039; for the relevant period, excluding the balcony area from the calculation. As the total built-up area fell below the required threshold after excluding the balcony area, the assessee was deemed entitled to the deduction under Section 80IB (10). The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>