<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 78 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249041</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the services provided were for brand promotion and not Business Auxiliary Services. It was held that the services became taxable only from 01/07/2010 under Section 65 (105) (zzzzq) and not under the previous category. The extended period for demand and penalties were deemed unjustified. The judgment was pronounced on 13/06/2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 78 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249041</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the services provided were for brand promotion and not Business Auxiliary Services. It was held that the services became taxable only from 01/07/2010 under Section 65 (105) (zzzzq) and not under the previous category. The extended period for demand and penalties were deemed unjustified. The judgment was pronounced on 13/06/2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>