<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 70 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249033</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for verification of missing registration numbers on service provider invoices, emphasizing the importance of verifying registration numbers and service tax payments before denying credit based on technical lapses. The Tribunal criticized the adjudicating authority for not conducting necessary verification and unnecessarily escalating the litigation, highlighting the benefit of credit for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 70 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249033</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for verification of missing registration numbers on service provider invoices, emphasizing the importance of verifying registration numbers and service tax payments before denying credit based on technical lapses. The Tribunal criticized the adjudicating authority for not conducting necessary verification and unnecessarily escalating the litigation, highlighting the benefit of credit for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>