<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 68 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty and interest demand against the appellants for contravening CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. However, following precedent, the penalty was waived as the unutilized Cenvat credit indicated no intention to avail inadmissible credit. The Appeals were disposed of with the penalty against the appellants being waived based on the legal interpretation and precedent established by the Tribunal in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 68 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty and interest demand against the appellants for contravening CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. However, following precedent, the penalty was waived as the unutilized Cenvat credit indicated no intention to avail inadmissible credit. The Appeals were disposed of with the penalty against the appellants being waived based on the legal interpretation and precedent established by the Tribunal in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>