<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 43 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249006</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the notice of reopening for Assessment Year 2007-08 as it was deemed a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer without indicating non-disclosure of material facts. The Court held that the officer&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction was not valid, leading to the petition being allowed. The notice under Section 148 and all subsequent proceedings were annulled, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 43 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249006</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the notice of reopening for Assessment Year 2007-08 as it was deemed a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer without indicating non-disclosure of material facts. The Court held that the officer&#039;s assumption of jurisdiction was not valid, leading to the petition being allowed. The notice under Section 148 and all subsequent proceedings were annulled, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>