<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 40 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249003</link>
    <description>The Court directed the tax authority to re-assess Davy&#039;s income, excluding the disputed amount, and ordered the Respondents to deposit any refundable sum with interest. The judgment focused on ensuring compliance with the High Court&#039;s decision and addressing discrepancies in the tax authority&#039;s actions, without conclusively deciding on the refund entitlement at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 40 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249003</link>
      <description>The Court directed the tax authority to re-assess Davy&#039;s income, excluding the disputed amount, and ordered the Respondents to deposit any refundable sum with interest. The judgment focused on ensuring compliance with the High Court&#039;s decision and addressing discrepancies in the tax authority&#039;s actions, without conclusively deciding on the refund entitlement at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>