<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1512 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165352</link>
    <description>Detained goods were ordered to be released provisionally pending adjudication after the petitioner offered to furnish a bank guarantee for the tax demand. The dispute arose from the respondents&#039; view that the consignment was being moved to a local godown for local sales, while the petitioner maintained that it was transported for onward movement to Delhi. The Court accepted release of the goods on the security offered and directed expeditious completion of the adjudication proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The operative effect was interim relief through provisional release, leaving the tax controversy to be decided in adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 18:20:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1512 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165352</link>
      <description>Detained goods were ordered to be released provisionally pending adjudication after the petitioner offered to furnish a bank guarantee for the tax demand. The dispute arose from the respondents&#039; view that the consignment was being moved to a local godown for local sales, while the petitioner maintained that it was transported for onward movement to Delhi. The Court accepted release of the goods on the security offered and directed expeditious completion of the adjudication proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The operative effect was interim relief through provisional release, leaving the tax controversy to be decided in adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>