<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 905 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165349</link>
    <description>The hydraulic mobile crane was treated as machinery under entry 33 of Part C of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, not as lifts or hoists under entry 8 of Part F. The crane&#039;s structure and use showed that it was a mechanically operated mobile machine mounted on a vehicle chassis, with the vehicle forming an integral subsidiary part of the machinery. Applying ejusdem generis, the broader machinery entry covered it, while the lift-and-hoist entry was confined to devices for raising or lowering persons or goods in a different sense. On that classification, penalty was not sustainable and was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 905 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165349</link>
      <description>The hydraulic mobile crane was treated as machinery under entry 33 of Part C of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, not as lifts or hoists under entry 8 of Part F. The crane&#039;s structure and use showed that it was a mechanically operated mobile machine mounted on a vehicle chassis, with the vehicle forming an integral subsidiary part of the machinery. Applying ejusdem generis, the broader machinery entry covered it, while the lift-and-hoist entry was confined to devices for raising or lowering persons or goods in a different sense. On that classification, penalty was not sustainable and was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>