<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1114 - ITAT  DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165347</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling that provision for diminution in value of investments cannot be added in the computation of book profit under section 115JB. It directed the assessee to provide evidence for prior period expenditure and allowed depreciation on office premises, emphasizing possession and payment as crucial factors in determining depreciation eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1114 - ITAT  DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165347</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling that provision for diminution in value of investments cannot be added in the computation of book profit under section 115JB. It directed the assessee to provide evidence for prior period expenditure and allowed depreciation on office premises, emphasizing possession and payment as crucial factors in determining depreciation eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>