<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 34 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248997</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, and confirming the payment of the differential interest amount. The decision emphasized compliance with statutory provisions and fair application of penalties and interest liabilities, aligning with previous decisions favoring assessees in similar situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 34 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248997</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, and confirming the payment of the differential interest amount. The decision emphasized compliance with statutory provisions and fair application of penalties and interest liabilities, aligning with previous decisions favoring assessees in similar situations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>