<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 4 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for both A.Y. 2004-05 and A.Y. 2006-07, directing the A.O. to allow the deduction under Section 10B on the profit of the eligible unit without setting off the brought forward unabsorbed depreciation. The preliminary issue regarding the validity of reopening the assessment for A.Y. 2004-05 was rendered infructuous and was not adjudicated upon. The orders of the CIT(A) were reversed, and the A.O. was directed to recompute the deduction under Section 10B as claimed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 06:27:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 4 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for both A.Y. 2004-05 and A.Y. 2006-07, directing the A.O. to allow the deduction under Section 10B on the profit of the eligible unit without setting off the brought forward unabsorbed depreciation. The preliminary issue regarding the validity of reopening the assessment for A.Y. 2004-05 was rendered infructuous and was not adjudicated upon. The orders of the CIT(A) were reversed, and the A.O. was directed to recompute the deduction under Section 10B as claimed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>