https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248961 The Tribunal rejected the appeal seeking condonation of delay in filing against the disallowance of cenvat credit. A dispute over the receipt date of the adjudication order was examined, with the jurisdictional Commissioner providing detailed evidence of service on the appellant's Accounts Officer. Despite conflicting affidavits, the appellant failed to adequately justify the delay, leading to the dismissal of the delay application and subsequent rejection of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the need for public authorities to justify delays in legal remedies, ultimately resulting in the rejection of the appeal and stay application. en-us Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Sep 2014 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248961 The Tribunal rejected the appeal seeking condonation of delay in filing against the disallowance of cenvat credit. A dispute over the receipt date of the adjudication order was examined, with the jurisdictional Commissioner providing detailed evidence of service on the appellant's Accounts Officer. Despite conflicting affidavits, the appellant failed to adequately justify the delay, leading to the dismissal of the delay application and subsequent rejection of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the need for public authorities to justify delays in legal remedies, ultimately resulting in the rejection of the appeal and stay application. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248961