https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248955 The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the CESTAT's order confirming the demand for Excise Duty on the intermediate product used in the manufacture of jute carpets. The Court noted the lack of evidence supporting the marketability of the product and the failure to consider previous CESTAT orders on similar issues. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, allowing both parties to present additional evidence for a comprehensive evaluation of the product's marketability. No costs were awarded in the judgment. en-us Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248955 The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the CESTAT's order confirming the demand for Excise Duty on the intermediate product used in the manufacture of jute carpets. The Court noted the lack of evidence supporting the marketability of the product and the failure to consider previous CESTAT orders on similar issues. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, allowing both parties to present additional evidence for a comprehensive evaluation of the product's marketability. No costs were awarded in the judgment. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248955