<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 835 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248931</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition due to improper service of notice for show cause proceedings. The petitioner&#039;s objections were not considered as the notice was sent to a closed business premises. The court emphasized the importance of proper service and directed the respondent to serve the order correctly, granting the petitioner time to appeal. Recovery proceedings were stayed pending the appeal outcome to ensure adherence to statutory procedures for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 835 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248931</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition due to improper service of notice for show cause proceedings. The petitioner&#039;s objections were not considered as the notice was sent to a closed business premises. The court emphasized the importance of proper service and directed the respondent to serve the order correctly, granting the petitioner time to appeal. Recovery proceedings were stayed pending the appeal outcome to ensure adherence to statutory procedures for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>