<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 831 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248927</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the cross-objection was rejected. The tribunal held that the appellant correctly availed the Composition Scheme for works contracts, disallowed the clubbing of contract values, acknowledged revenue neutrality, and ruled out the invocation of the extended period of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 831 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248927</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the cross-objection was rejected. The tribunal held that the appellant correctly availed the Composition Scheme for works contracts, disallowed the clubbing of contract values, acknowledged revenue neutrality, and ruled out the invocation of the extended period of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>