<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 829 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248925</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the Government Resolution providing a loan to Tata Motors Limited, ruling it legal and not constituting a VAT refund. Allegations of policy misuse were rejected, citing industry norms. The court emphasized the significant delay in filing the petition and highlighted the positive impact of the Nano project on industrialization and economic growth, ultimately finding the petition lacked merit and did not serve public interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 829 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248925</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the Government Resolution providing a loan to Tata Motors Limited, ruling it legal and not constituting a VAT refund. Allegations of policy misuse were rejected, citing industry norms. The court emphasized the significant delay in filing the petition and highlighted the positive impact of the Nano project on industrialization and economic growth, ultimately finding the petition lacked merit and did not serve public interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>