<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 823 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248919</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, citing lack of categorical findings and reliance on assumptions by the adjudicating authority. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence and proper legal application in imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 823 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248919</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, citing lack of categorical findings and reliance on assumptions by the adjudicating authority. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence and proper legal application in imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>