<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 931 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165306</link>
    <description>A hire-purchase turnover dispute required fresh factual scrutiny because the documentary record before the Tribunal was incomplete, so the remand to the assessing authority was upheld and no revisional interference was warranted. On lease receipts arising from transfer of the right to use goods, the article states that Explanation 3(d) to section 2(1)(t) could not be applied where the deemed sale was an outside-State sale, a sale in the course of import or export, or an inter-State sale. As the transactions were treated as inter-State sales, the State levy under section 5C could not stand and the deletion of tax on the lease receipts was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 931 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165306</link>
      <description>A hire-purchase turnover dispute required fresh factual scrutiny because the documentary record before the Tribunal was incomplete, so the remand to the assessing authority was upheld and no revisional interference was warranted. On lease receipts arising from transfer of the right to use goods, the article states that Explanation 3(d) to section 2(1)(t) could not be applied where the deemed sale was an outside-State sale, a sale in the course of import or export, or an inter-State sale. As the transactions were treated as inter-State sales, the State levy under section 5C could not stand and the deletion of tax on the lease receipts was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>