<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1037 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165305</link>
    <description>The court upheld the authorities&#039; decision that the transactions constituted inter-State sales based on the records and rejected the petitioner&#039;s argument regarding sales tax exemption for the transfer of cement to Pondicherry. The court directed that sales tax on a portion of the cement quantity be confirmed, while the remaining quantity be re-evaluated individually by the assessing officer in compliance with the law, emphasizing the need to scrutinize each transaction separately for tax assessment purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1037 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165305</link>
      <description>The court upheld the authorities&#039; decision that the transactions constituted inter-State sales based on the records and rejected the petitioner&#039;s argument regarding sales tax exemption for the transfer of cement to Pondicherry. The court directed that sales tax on a portion of the cement quantity be confirmed, while the remaining quantity be re-evaluated individually by the assessing officer in compliance with the law, emphasizing the need to scrutinize each transaction separately for tax assessment purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>