<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 876 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165302</link>
    <description>A remand for fresh inquiry into the genuineness of tax invoices was upheld where the assessing authority had material suggesting the invoices were not genuine, including the selling dealer&#039;s non-filing of returns and suspension of registration. The appellate authority directed verification of the seller&#039;s status, the cheques said to have been issued against the invoices, and an opportunity for cross-examination, so that the claim to VAT set-off and the connected penalty proceedings could be properly determined. The court treated the remand as causing no prejudice to the assessee and found it justified in the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:07:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 876 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165302</link>
      <description>A remand for fresh inquiry into the genuineness of tax invoices was upheld where the assessing authority had material suggesting the invoices were not genuine, including the selling dealer&#039;s non-filing of returns and suspension of registration. The appellate authority directed verification of the seller&#039;s status, the cheques said to have been issued against the invoices, and an opportunity for cross-examination, so that the claim to VAT set-off and the connected penalty proceedings could be properly determined. The court treated the remand as causing no prejudice to the assessee and found it justified in the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>