<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 799 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248895</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application seeking condonation of delay in filing a Cross Objection, emphasizing the need to justify delays in legal proceedings uniformly, even for Public Sector Undertakings. The decision highlighted that the principle of condonation of delay should not grant special treatment without sufficient cause, underscoring the importance of providing valid reasons for delays in filing legal documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:05:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 799 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248895</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application seeking condonation of delay in filing a Cross Objection, emphasizing the need to justify delays in legal proceedings uniformly, even for Public Sector Undertakings. The decision highlighted that the principle of condonation of delay should not grant special treatment without sufficient cause, underscoring the importance of providing valid reasons for delays in filing legal documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>