<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 786 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remand, directing the ld. Commr. (Appeals) to decide the issue afresh, granting both parties an opportunity for hearing and evidence submission. The case was disposed of accordingly. The judgment emphasizes procedural compliance in filing appeals, rectifying defects promptly, and the authority&#039;s duty to decide cases on their merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 17:05:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 786 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remand, directing the ld. Commr. (Appeals) to decide the issue afresh, granting both parties an opportunity for hearing and evidence submission. The case was disposed of accordingly. The judgment emphasizes procedural compliance in filing appeals, rectifying defects promptly, and the authority&#039;s duty to decide cases on their merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>