https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248877 A court-confirmed auction cannot be defeated later by the notifying authority on the basis of an omission in the sale notice, where the purchaser participated, paid the bid amount, and proceeded as a bona fide purchaser for value. The land had been held under a lease-cum-sale arrangement, but the notice broadly described the assets and did not clearly confine the sale to leasehold rights alone. In these circumstances, the authority could not rely on that omission to refuse conveyance after the sale had been confirmed and acted upon, as that would amount to approbating and reprobating. The purchaser was therefore entitled to execution of the conveyance deed. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jun 2014 16:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248877 A court-confirmed auction cannot be defeated later by the notifying authority on the basis of an omission in the sale notice, where the purchaser participated, paid the bid amount, and proceeded as a bona fide purchaser for value. The land had been held under a lease-cum-sale arrangement, but the notice broadly described the assets and did not clearly confine the sale to leasehold rights alone. In these circumstances, the authority could not rely on that omission to refuse conveyance after the sale had been confirmed and acted upon, as that would amount to approbating and reprobating. The purchaser was therefore entitled to execution of the conveyance deed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248877