<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 764 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248860</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal disposed of the appeal and remitted the matter back to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration based on the adjudication order. Recovery proceedings were initiated against the appellant for providing Business Auxiliary Services to various entities. The appellant was accused of providing services without furnishing requested details. The appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation during the assessment process was criticized. The adjudication order was deemed lacking in factual analysis, leading to its remittance for fresh consideration. Costs were imposed on the appellant for non-cooperative conduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 764 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248860</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal disposed of the appeal and remitted the matter back to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration based on the adjudication order. Recovery proceedings were initiated against the appellant for providing Business Auxiliary Services to various entities. The appellant was accused of providing services without furnishing requested details. The appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation during the assessment process was criticized. The adjudication order was deemed lacking in factual analysis, leading to its remittance for fresh consideration. Costs were imposed on the appellant for non-cooperative conduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>