<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 763 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order and allowed the appeal, ruling that the liability to pay Service Tax under Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services falls on the consignee who pays the freight, in accordance with Rule 2(1)(d)(v) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The judgment emphasized that statutory provisions prevail over administrative circulars, providing relief to the appellant and clarifying the interpretation of the relevant rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 763 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudicating authority&#039;s order and allowed the appeal, ruling that the liability to pay Service Tax under Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services falls on the consignee who pays the freight, in accordance with Rule 2(1)(d)(v) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The judgment emphasized that statutory provisions prevail over administrative circulars, providing relief to the appellant and clarifying the interpretation of the relevant rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>