<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 756 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248852</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Appeal against the Order-in-Appeal due to the Review Order being barred by limitation under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to statutory timelines for review orders, citing the case of Vel Pharma. Despite arguments for condonation, the Tribunal upheld the principle that review orders must be issued within the prescribed time limit, leading to the dismissal of the Appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 756 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248852</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Appeal against the Order-in-Appeal due to the Review Order being barred by limitation under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to statutory timelines for review orders, citing the case of Vel Pharma. Despite arguments for condonation, the Tribunal upheld the principle that review orders must be issued within the prescribed time limit, leading to the dismissal of the Appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>