<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 755 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248851</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI held that charges for Aluminium Doors, Windows, and Curtain Frame need not be included in the assessable value of goods as they are not linked to the manufacturing process but are post-clearance activities. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and ruled in favor of the appellant in both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:57:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 755 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248851</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI held that charges for Aluminium Doors, Windows, and Curtain Frame need not be included in the assessable value of goods as they are not linked to the manufacturing process but are post-clearance activities. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and ruled in favor of the appellant in both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=248851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>